I think TOP matters more in the NFL
NFL offenses are safer and more methodical. So many teams start taking less chances once they get into field goal range. Once a team gets the lead in the 4th quarter, many coaches will opt to run the football. They don't need style points: they need the win.
College offenses are much different. In many games, one team is clearly much more physically superior than the other team. Lack of quality depth means that the weaker team will probably fade in the 4th quarter. The better team has no interest in putting on the brakes once it takes the lead. Style points matter. If a player is in the running for the Heisman, then he's going to get additional reps to pad his stats.
I'd say there are more "big plays" in college football. Busted coverages, blown assignments, WR A is 5x faster than CB A, et al. As a result, many offenses can score from anywhere on the field. Now throw in fast-paced offenses like Kelly's, or Dick Rod's. Because of that, TOP doesn't really tell the whole story.
Complete thread:
- [original post] some thoughts on TOP and game pacing -
HumanRobot,
2010-07-26, 14:17
- what do you think of this? -
Jay,
2010-07-26, 18:45
- The defensive variables are more significant -
suave_andrew,
2010-07-26, 21:42
- that's the intent of the proof -
Jay,
2010-07-26, 21:54
- Also, TOP and tempo don't necessarily go hand in hand. -
LaFortune Teller,
2010-07-26, 22:10
- Interesting.
-
APND02,
2010-07-27, 05:07
- Interesting.
- Also, TOP and tempo don't necessarily go hand in hand. -
LaFortune Teller,
2010-07-26, 22:10
- that's the intent of the proof -
Jay,
2010-07-26, 21:54
- I didn't look at the data, but is it -
APND02,
2010-07-26, 20:02
- it seems to show defense > offense - Jay, 2010-07-26, 21:33
- The defensive variables are more significant -
suave_andrew,
2010-07-26, 21:42
- Very interesting -
suave_andrew,
2010-07-26, 16:28
- TOP is overrated -
MHB (Rakes of Mallow),
2010-07-26, 19:19
- It may be overrated as a measure of team success, but -
APND02,
2010-07-26, 20:05
- TOP tends to be the result of a good team, -
nedhead,
2010-07-27, 03:22
- I think this is the correct answer. Well put.
-
APND02,
2010-07-27, 06:56
- I think this is the correct answer. Well put.
- this dovetails nicely -
Jay,
2010-07-26, 21:37
- Jay, did you look at whether or not a heavy dose of run -
APND02,
2010-07-27, 06:55
- I haven't -
Jay,
2010-07-27, 08:53
- I didn't find it to be a critical factor, mostly because - APND02, 2010-07-27, 11:02
- I haven't -
Jay,
2010-07-27, 08:53
- This could absolutely be it. Although I wouldn't say they - APND02, 2010-07-27, 05:02
- Jay, did you look at whether or not a heavy dose of run -
APND02,
2010-07-27, 06:55
- TOP tends to be the result of a good team, -
nedhead,
2010-07-27, 03:22
- It may be overrated as a measure of team success, but -
APND02,
2010-07-26, 20:05
- also -
Jay,
2010-07-26, 17:12
- I absolutely agree with you Jay. -
APND02,
2010-07-26, 17:20
- I think TOP matters more in the NFL - Geoff, 2010-07-27, 03:09
- I absolutely agree with you Jay. -
APND02,
2010-07-26, 17:20
- TOP is overrated -
MHB (Rakes of Mallow),
2010-07-26, 19:19
- good stuff
-
Pat,
2010-07-26, 14:40
- what do you think of this? -
Jay,
2010-07-26, 18:45