Is that fully on him?

by irishoutsider , Wednesday, May 16, 2012, 06:53 (5138 days ago) @ hobbs

I may be revising history here, but wasnt 2004 part of the transition between Malloy and Jenkins. I thought I recall Jenkins having the authority to fire Willingham as "future business" but the constraints were still firmly in the mold of the previous regime.

locked

135 views

Complete thread:

Charlie's buyout - Jim (fisherj08), 2012-05-15, 20:26
- Is that $19 million figure - CK08, 2012-05-16, 06:26
  - It looks like he's getting paid through 2015 - Kumar, 2012-05-16, 08:56
  - Right. I thought that it had been reported that there had - BillyGoat, 2012-05-16, 07:55
- Losing is expensive - hobbs, 2012-05-15, 22:31
  - Is that fully on him? - irishoutsider, 2012-05-16, 06:53
    - I believe that Monk should be saddled with the financial - BillyGoat, 2012-05-16, 07:53
- So we're done paying Willingham, I guess. - LaFortune Teller, 2012-05-15, 20:47
- The gift that keeps on giving - Bill, 2012-05-15, 20:34
  - I reserve most of mine for White. - KGB, 2012-05-16, 08:52
- Heard he plans on donating to the general scholarship fund. - River, 2012-05-15, 20:33
  - If he made it an unrestricted gift... - Greg, 2012-05-15, 20:37

the Polo Grounds

Is that fully on him?