The biggest issue, probably for me, is airing this publicly
You'd have liked for this to be a discussion that doesn't need ESPN as the mouthpiece.
But then again, I think the administration has probably been reluctant to budge on some matters. Hell, it took Kelly 9 months to actually sign his extension because he was concerned with issues in dealing with the leadership....
http://www.und.com/sports/m-footbl/recaps/090113aaf.html
Q. If you don't want to get into specifics, what elements in this are important to you? Are there elements that you really wanted to address that this does address for the next five years?
COACH KELLY: I just think the contract is one that has involved the leadership of the university. Obviously, Jack Swarbrick, Father Jenkins, we've all been in discussion about the future of the program. So when we come to an agreement, it's not necessarily that within it I get a lunch stipend on Tuesdays and Thursdays. It's about that we're all together in this contract about moving the program forward. Do you know what I mean? That we've all decided that by signing this contract, we're all in it together, and that's what I was looking for.
By my signature on it, Father Jenkins' signature on it and Jack Swarbrick's signature on it, we've all agreed that the principles within this contract is that we're all in it together, and our voices, the communication was the huge piece for me. That that dialogue is open, and that's what I was looking for.
That's an awful long time from when it was decided he was coming back in January.
While I'd like to believe this could have happened behind closed doors, another part of me remembers what it's like dealing with ND's administration and its stubbornness.
The reality is I don't think he's saying anything controversial. I don't think it's a too much of an ask allowing players to take 12 credit hours a semester. BillyGoat summarized the tension pretty well the other day... http://bluegraysky.com/forum/index.php?id=287867
Complete thread:
- what's your take on Kelly's "at risk" commentary -
Jay,
2015-06-12, 09:56
- He had to do this in a public setting - Jim (fisherj08), 2015-06-12, 11:53
- I have one small thought to add -
Greg,
2015-06-12, 11:33
- that's definitely in play -
HumanRobot,
2015-06-12, 11:51
- Sorry. I wasn't clear. -
Greg,
2015-06-12, 12:00
- I see what you're saying now
-
HumanRobot,
2015-06-12, 12:08
- I see what you're saying now
- Sorry. I wasn't clear. -
Greg,
2015-06-12, 12:00
- that's definitely in play -
HumanRobot,
2015-06-12, 11:51
- "Force them into finding shortcuts" bothers me -
HCE,
2015-06-12, 11:02
- Agreed. They are separate issues. - Coach Gillespie, 2015-06-12, 13:52
- good point
-
Jay,
2015-06-12, 11:17
- Only suggestion would be to use a different term -
Ken Fowler,
2015-06-12, 10:29
- Agree. I wish he had worded it differently. -
NDinVA,
2015-06-12, 10:47
- And that overshadows the primary point - Domer99, 2015-06-12, 11:30
- Those non-ND fans have been saying such things for decades -
Jack,
2015-06-12, 11:04
- I know, but I don't like that our coach gave them more ammo. -
NDinVA,
2015-06-12, 11:16
- Like he hasn't before? - Jack, 2015-06-12, 13:58
- I know, but I don't like that our coach gave them more ammo. -
NDinVA,
2015-06-12, 11:16
- yep, I don't think he's complaining. - Jay, 2015-06-12, 10:35
- Agree. I wish he had worded it differently. -
NDinVA,
2015-06-12, 10:47
- There's a couple issues here -
HumanRobot,
2015-06-12, 10:23
- The biggest issue, probably for me, is airing this publicly -
Domer99,
2015-06-12, 11:19
- ESPN just rehashed Eric Hansen in the SBT -
Jack,
2015-06-12, 14:01
- That's the comical thing about it - Domer99, 2015-06-12, 16:12
- ESPN just rehashed Eric Hansen in the SBT -
Jack,
2015-06-12, 14:01
- I assume Stanford's "cooling glove" also helps with - BillyGoat, 2015-06-12, 11:06
- Agreed, but 1 isn't any different now than it ever was at ND - Jack, 2015-06-12, 10:49
- interesting post. makes sense, given that -
Jay,
2015-06-12, 10:38
- also, there are some real doozies in that thread -
Jay,
2015-06-12, 10:44
- Is it ever that surprising? - Domer99, 2015-06-12, 11:26
- also, there are some real doozies in that thread -
Jay,
2015-06-12, 10:44
- The biggest issue, probably for me, is airing this publicly -
Domer99,
2015-06-12, 11:19
- Less bullshit = better
-
Dylan,
2015-06-12, 10:00
- "at risk" is such a loaded term -
Jay,
2015-06-12, 10:12
- They are at risk of becoming ineligible -
Dylan,
2015-06-12, 11:02
- I don't care that he said it either - Jay, 2015-06-12, 11:10
- You have to look at that with KeiVarae Russell in mind. -
Bill,
2015-06-12, 10:35
- I am talking about the typical use of the term "at risk" -
Jay,
2015-06-12, 10:48
- I don't think anybody took it in that context.
-
Bill,
2015-06-12, 10:59
- I did. - PMan, 2015-06-12, 13:37
- well, I did -
Jay,
2015-06-12, 11:01
- I knew what he was saying, but that connotation definitely - Ken Fowler, 2015-06-12, 11:05
- I don't think anybody took it in that context.
- I am talking about the typical use of the term "at risk" -
Jay,
2015-06-12, 10:48
- He's not dumb - JRT, 2015-06-12, 10:30
- I think this is exactly right. It's just a term a bit out of - BillyGoat, 2015-06-12, 10:20
- They are at risk of becoming ineligible -
Dylan,
2015-06-12, 11:02
- "at risk" is such a loaded term -
Jay,
2015-06-12, 10:12
- Some things are best left unsaid? -
River,
2015-06-12, 09:58
- would have been better if he had completed the thought -
Jay,
2015-06-12, 10:08
- Agreed. - River, 2015-06-12, 10:18
- would have been better if he had completed the thought -
Jay,
2015-06-12, 10:08