Very interesting.

by Jim (fisherj08) , A Samoan kid's laptop, Sunday, June 13, 2010, 14:43 (5841 days ago) @ suave_andrew

I would argue that the bigger thing at play is that recruiting rankings are good and ranking kids from, say, 1-100. After that, though, its a total crapshoot.

locked

1298 views

Complete thread:

Ongoing recruiting project - suave_andrew, 2010-06-13, 12:04
- cool chart - HumanRobot, 2010-06-13, 15:25
  - Cincinnati was in Conference USA until recently - suave_andrew, 2010-06-13, 15:41
    - oh, forgot about that - HumanRobot, 2010-06-13, 15:56
      - relative recruiting rankings since 2005 - HumanRobot, 2010-06-13, 17:40
        
        I did a similar analysis after Kelly was hired - BPH, 2010-06-13, 18:06
- Very interesting. - Jim (fisherj08), 2010-06-13, 14:43
- More anecdotal than what you're looking for - CW (Rakes), 2010-06-13, 14:07
  - I recall the ones posted on BGS - suave_andrew, 2010-06-13, 14:30
    - BGS links - Jay, 2010-06-13, 14:47
    - It may be useful to look at the record against top 30 teams - Mobster, 2010-06-13, 14:38
      - Scheduling always throws a monkey wrench into this - suave_andrew, 2010-06-13, 14:46
        
        I like to use power ratings - Jeff (BGS), 2010-06-13, 16:42

the Polo Grounds

Very interesting.