It may be useful to look at the record against top 30 teams
Just winning % may be a bad metric given the weaknesses you cited. It is affected by who they play. BSU may be recruiting better than every team in the WAC which could explain their strong winning % but it is hardly indicative of a status as an elite team.
Complete thread:
- Ongoing recruiting project -
suave_andrew,
2010-06-13, 12:04
- cool chart -
HumanRobot,
2010-06-13, 15:25
- Cincinnati was in Conference USA until recently -
suave_andrew,
2010-06-13, 15:41
- oh, forgot about that -
HumanRobot,
2010-06-13, 15:56
- relative recruiting rankings since 2005 -
HumanRobot,
2010-06-13, 17:40
- I did a similar analysis after Kelly was hired - BPH, 2010-06-13, 18:06
- relative recruiting rankings since 2005 -
HumanRobot,
2010-06-13, 17:40
- oh, forgot about that -
HumanRobot,
2010-06-13, 15:56
- Cincinnati was in Conference USA until recently -
suave_andrew,
2010-06-13, 15:41
- Very interesting. - Jim (fisherj08), 2010-06-13, 14:43
- More anecdotal than what you're looking for -
CW (Rakes),
2010-06-13, 14:07
- I recall the ones posted on BGS -
suave_andrew,
2010-06-13, 14:30
- BGS links - Jay, 2010-06-13, 14:47
- It may be useful to look at the record against top 30 teams -
Mobster,
2010-06-13, 14:38
- Scheduling always throws a monkey wrench into this -
suave_andrew,
2010-06-13, 14:46
- I like to use power ratings - Jeff (BGS), 2010-06-13, 16:42
- Scheduling always throws a monkey wrench into this -
suave_andrew,
2010-06-13, 14:46
- I recall the ones posted on BGS -
suave_andrew,
2010-06-13, 14:30
- cool chart -
HumanRobot,
2010-06-13, 15:25