He never posted the formula itself.
by LaFortune Teller 
, South Bend, Wednesday, July 28, 2010, 00:39 (5797 days ago) @ Bryan (IrishCavan)
And I don't think it's particularly worthwhile to try to arrive at a "perfect" formula using only scores. Actually, I think the entire project is better suited for big picture comparisons than year vs. year ones. In other words, using this data to talk about the strength of Alabama's last 100 years versus Notre Dame's last 100 years as a program would be more instructive than trying to convince anyone about where those respective programs' best ten teams should fall relative to one another as individual seasons.
Complete thread:
- FO's top 100 teams of the last 100 years. -
LaFortune Teller,
2010-07-27, 16:23
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- No '24 Irish? -
PMan,
2010-07-28, 04:58
- 1929, 1947, 1949 and 1953 also are missing - Sherman Oaks, 2010-07-28, 08:10
- On 88 and 89 -
Jeff (BGS),
2010-07-27, 19:36
- I'm with you on 88 and 89. -
LaFortune Teller,
2010-07-28, 00:35
- Those of us who lived through it know exactly what you mean
![[ [ No text ] ]](themes/default/images/no_text.png "Empty posting / no text")
-
Sherman Oaks,
2010-07-28, 08:07
- Those of us who lived through it know exactly what you mean
- I'm with you on 88 and 89. -
LaFortune Teller,
2010-07-28, 00:35
- I guess Bama really did win 12 championships. -
Bryan (IrishCavan),
2010-07-27, 18:55
- I've always thought the SEC was stronger before integration -
JRT,
2010-07-28, 04:06
- Your snark is well-taken - Sherman Oaks, 2010-07-28, 08:06
- He never posted the formula itself. - LaFortune Teller, 2010-07-28, 00:39
- I've always thought the SEC was stronger before integration -
JRT,
2010-07-28, 04:06
- No '24 Irish? -
PMan,
2010-07-28, 04:58