I'm with you on 88 and 89.
by LaFortune Teller 
, South Bend, Wednesday, July 28, 2010, 00:35 (5797 days ago) @ Jeff (BGS)
On the 1989 v 1993 arguments, I've always thought that we deserved to be honored as champions in 1993 moreso than 1989, and that we deserved to be honored as the best team in college football in 1989 moreso than 1993. That might not make sense to everyone (or anyone?), but it makes perfect sense to me.
Complete thread:
- FO's top 100 teams of the last 100 years. -
LaFortune Teller,
2010-07-27, 16:23
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- No '24 Irish? -
PMan,
2010-07-28, 04:58
- 1929, 1947, 1949 and 1953 also are missing - Sherman Oaks, 2010-07-28, 08:10
- On 88 and 89 -
Jeff (BGS),
2010-07-27, 19:36
- I'm with you on 88 and 89. -
LaFortune Teller,
2010-07-28, 00:35
- Those of us who lived through it know exactly what you mean
![[ [ No text ] ]](themes/default/images/no_text.png "Empty posting / no text")
-
Sherman Oaks,
2010-07-28, 08:07
- Those of us who lived through it know exactly what you mean
- I'm with you on 88 and 89. -
LaFortune Teller,
2010-07-28, 00:35
- I guess Bama really did win 12 championships. -
Bryan (IrishCavan),
2010-07-27, 18:55
- I've always thought the SEC was stronger before integration -
JRT,
2010-07-28, 04:06
- Your snark is well-taken - Sherman Oaks, 2010-07-28, 08:06
- He never posted the formula itself. - LaFortune Teller, 2010-07-28, 00:39
- I've always thought the SEC was stronger before integration -
JRT,
2010-07-28, 04:06
- No '24 Irish? -
PMan,
2010-07-28, 04:58