Oh, I agree - they were probably better than 5-6

by CK08, Thursday, May 17, 2012, 06:25 (5137 days ago) @ Jeff (BGS)
edited by CK08, Thursday, May 17, 2012, 07:04

But that wasn't a 10-1 team that caught some bad breaks, and a lot of people view it through the lens of the 88-93 run and talk it up like it was some great precursor of things to come - when in fact it was more like 2008 to 1985's 2007. A big improvement, but nowhere near where we needed to be.

This wouldn't bother me, except frequently the same people will use words like "suck", "failure", or "disaster" to describe last year's team, which actually was a 10-win team that caught some bad breaks.


Complete thread:

 

powered by my little forum