the Polo Grounds

Back to the forum index

Open in thread

Good point

by BPH, San Diego, Thursday, May 14, 2026, 08:41 (12 days ago) @ BillyGoat
edited by BPH, Thursday, May 14, 2026, 08:53

The other proposed changes to the sport are mostly positive: as you mentioned, eliminating the conference title games, all teams starting the regular season at Week Zero to be able to end it the Saturday after Thanksgiving, and reducing the crazy-long layoffs to be able to finish the playoff in early January rather than the end of the month.

363 views

Complete thread:

Has it been posted that ND supports the 24-team playoff? - BPH, 2026-05-14, 08:21
- Its so funny to watch - Jeremy (WeIsND), 2026-05-15, 08:43
- Pete is not Jack + Picking Your Battles - NDJuban, 2026-05-15, 08:11
  - Most of this makes sense to me - KGB, 2026-05-15, 10:01
    - I have accepted that we will never get universal support. - San Pedro, 2026-05-15, 10:13
- Minority view - Dallasdomer, 2026-05-15, 02:30
  - garbage 7-5 teams getting into a playoff - Jay, 2026-05-15, 07:22
    - I haven’t done a mock playoff - Dallasdomer, 2026-05-15, 11:33
      - 5-loss Duke would have been in this year - Jay, 2026-05-15, 11:42
        
        So, yes, more teams will get in - Dallasdomer, 2026-05-15, 19:06
        
        Would that be true with no conference game? - Tim, 2026-05-15, 14:13
    - Yep. The only silver lining is that the likelihood of - Jack, 2026-05-15, 10:25
  - My opposition isn't because of traditionalism - Domer99, 2026-05-15, 07:05
    - I think it will still be very high stakes. - MattG, 2026-05-15, 08:03
      - not sure I follow - there will be lots of 3-loss teams - Jay, 2026-05-15, 08:41
    - It will also surely lead to some "load management" bullshit. - KGB, 2026-05-15, 07:21
    - I agree. - San Pedro, 2026-05-15, 07:12
      - it's going to suck - Jay, 2026-05-15, 07:24
        
        As compared to what? - Mike (bart), 2026-05-15, 09:45
        
        honestly what's the difference - Jay, 2026-05-15, 10:31
  - If it wipes out the CCGs, I'm for it - Jeff (BGS), 2026-05-15, 07:01
  - Same... - nedhead, 2026-05-15, 02:42
    - Agreed, I'm all for it - Mike (bart), 2026-05-15, 06:10
- Disappointing for our AD to support this - beattherush, 2026-05-14, 09:48
  - You may be proven correct - KGB, 2026-05-14, 10:33
    - I think we still have leverage vs the ACC - Jay, 2026-05-14, 10:53
      - Agree. - KGB, 2026-05-14, 11:19
- Wonder if 24 also might stave off superconference - LaFortune Teller, 2026-05-14, 09:41
- I quote the great Bill Murray: - Greg, 2026-05-14, 09:16
  - Underrated movie. - beattherush, 2026-05-14, 09:47
- I am hoping we traded it for something. - Tim, 2026-05-14, 08:44
  - future B10 home and homes, hopefully - Jay, 2026-05-14, 08:56
    - SEC doesn't want 24, they wouldn't make that trade. - Tim, 2026-05-14, 10:28
      - brainfart, was thinking B10 - Jay, 2026-05-14, 10:36
- disappointing for the sport - Jay, 2026-05-14, 08:30
- 24 teams is stupid. But our motivation might be that it will - BillyGoat, 2026-05-14, 08:23
  - Good point - BPH, 2026-05-14, 08:41
  - It would also theoretically make scheduling easier - KGB, 2026-05-14, 08:32
    - I think you will see bifurcated scheduling philosophies - Jeff (BGS), 2026-05-14, 12:57
    - 8 would be an adequate number in an ideal world without - BillyGoat, 2026-05-14, 09:20
      - cosine - Joe I, 2026-05-15, 09:17
    - Yeah, I think it's an unfortunate compromise. - Joe I, 2026-05-14, 09:00
    - We need to protect 8-4 teams and a potential 7-5 Bama team. - Chris, 2026-05-14, 08:38
      - Most 8-4 B1G and SEC teams will make the playoff - Aaron (Shakespeare), 2026-05-14, 11:00

powered by my little forum