Good point. The Caps &/or CBJ would have made the playoffs
With better backup goaltending. Lindgren was horrible for them this year. I was at one game that the covered the over early in the 2nd.
The replay was on of the Bones rant game last night, and honestly, he's just using that to send a message. They outshot the Caps by about 14 until they gave up a late power play which was the game winner. It wasn't egregious. I get why he's posturing for next season, but it was a bit over the top. Just my opinion.
I'll bet 100 space bucks that Kent Johnson goes in a player for player trade.
They need a second goalie who isn't Elvis.
His contract at this point should be manageable enough to buy out if they can't unload him. There's just too much stank on him by now, and both sides could really use a fresh start. Go grab some solid vet who can take a portion of the workload off Jet's plate.
Pretty sure that was Bones' message to Waddell
That he wants back in.
Agree with you that Jenner probably needs to go, and that there are some good pieces there. I'm afraid that Garland trade might come back to haunt them - that contract has 6 more years on it, and he didn't seem like a Top 9 guy in the most important moments of the season.
Seeing Greaves turn into a Top 10 goalie in the league, and seeing more and more flashes of Fantilli as a legit 1C were definitely the best parts of the season.
And Iran has posted their rebuttal
Every time I think they reality can’t get any weirder…
https://x.com/franciswegner/status/2043664677108842923?s=46&t=xfPxCAKzJoA443W_NTupEw
--
At night, the ice weasels come.
There is no statement of support for Trump there
I really wish people would stop reading their own take into words that aren't there.
It said they support the Pope. There was no statement of support for Trump.
Man, I wasn't even aware until you said that.
I gave up watching when Buffalo wiped them out on Thursday. Caught bits of the game in Montreal while out to dinner Saturday, but that was obviously just more fool's gold which was exposed on Sunday against the B's. Getting goalied by Korpi 2x down the stretch is unacceptable in so many ways.
After now watching the video clip, I'm fuckin praying that Waddell convinces him to take this on again in the fall. Talking about a man who has been in the game for a half-century and coached practically every team in the damn league, and this dumb, loser-ass franchise nearly broke him in a way that none ever could before. REALLY hope he comes back and that they make some material changes. It's clear that he cares more than most in that clubhouse, and the guy only showed up in January.
For me, it starts with Jenner. He's been a good, productive player here for many years and I'm not blaming all of CBJ's ills on any one guy, but he wears the C and has been a common denominator as a quote-unquote leader during this fallow stretch. See ya. There are probably some other obvious flushes, but it's tough to know where to even begin. There's good stuff to build around (Z, Fantilli, Marchy, Mateychuk, etc), but they simply can't just run it back again in 26-27 after this ridiculous faceplant.
Someone needed to say it
That whole franchise has had a loser's mentality since Day One. Everyone knows it, and that's why barely anyone wants to play there if they have the choice of going elsewhere. Columbus is too concerned with "we have a great environment to raise families!" than in building a kick-ass hockey team.
As usual, you nailed it.
And don't get me started on the Hughes brothers.
Also...
What did you think of Bowness going all Lee Elia/Lasorda last night?
To add to this,
I think it's a lot easier to double-down on opinions rather than change them. I think that's driven both by social group but also just individually.
What information gets through that would change opinions? Personal experience. And most of national politics is just beyond our personal experience. Most people, especially in MAGA, are not really affected by crazy shit -- who cares that we are killing Iranians, as long as we don't see it in gas prices or inflation. Where are the declines in MAGA support? Probably in Hispanic Americans, because they are far more likely to have seen negative consequences.
Without personal experience, it's easier for us to stay with our social networks and established positions.
Ok, well, it's a release on the ND website too...
And it's nothing more.
They didn't even bother to send it out to alumni emails, near as I can tell.
https://news.nd.edu/news/statement-from-university-president-rev-robert-a-dowd-c-s-c-in...
I agree social media isn't much of a form of standing up, but it seems they weren't interested in doing much more.
--
Sometimes I rhyme slow sometimes I rhyme quick.
I don’t think social media is standing up to anything
And we should resist the message that it is. I don’t disagree with your point that ND should “stand up” for the Pope. I just disagree that a tweet is the way to do it. McElroy didn’t tweet, he preached. That’s what Dowd should do.
Audience is other clergy, then Trump.
Chronically online ND people probably wouldn’t even see it. It’s an attempt to look like you’re saying something without actually saying anything - because while they support the Pope of course, they also support Trump.
Right. Sufficient isn't Leadership.
Stand up and say that the most famous Catholic institution in America stands with the Pope and against Trump's words and actions.
--
Sometimes I rhyme slow sometimes I rhyme quick.
Yes, read it, and I agree to a point.
I think there is something to having made the one-time decision to cast your lot with Trump that leads to complementary decisions. Is it system 1 thinking that leads that type of person to consume only pro-Trump/self-reinforcing information, or is that it is the only socially acceptable news source for Trump supporters? What about agreeing with whatever random thing Trump's mind happens to vomit, even if it contradicts your past conservative beliefs? I think there is a lot of social influence once you are there to just keep going, and you're not deciding much of anything.
--
[Normal] Florida man
Much of the answer to your question is due to bandwidth.
So many people are just scraping by with their day-to-day lives that they just don't have the capacity (mental, physical, emotional) to delve deeper into these thoughts and the ramifications of their own decisions.
Clearly though, there are far too many out there that simply revel in the attacks on "other", and a need to be better than "other".
I thought of Kahneman
when I read Max's post, too. Then yes, that's all of us, except there are degrees.
I don't want to give myself false hope. We'll see what happens with the midterms, but I think Trump's victory has more to do with economic issues felt throughout the world than it does 77 million loyal followers unwilling to interrogate some vital points of healthy politics. But forty million voters unwilling to do so is still too fucking many and raises a systemic question of why?
what would Hesburgh do?
ND doesn’t want to cross the Trump administration and end up getting attacked like so many of its peers. So far they’ve been successful and even managed to avoid the Pentagon grad school blacklist. What Dowd released is the bare minimum of what he should be saying. Is this the preeminent Catholic university in the world or not? Where is the leadership and the activism? Other Catholic voices are stepping up — where is Notre Dame?
Who's the audience here, though?
It's much more narrow than, say, a diocese or archdiocese. It's ND stakeholders (alumni, students, other interested parties) who likely already know all about it, or if they don't, they'll make the effort to find out.
Have you read "Thinking, Fast and Slow"
by Kahneman? I think that framework may work better, and is associated with less of an implied value judgement. We all use heuristics and cognitive shortcuts in day to day life (System 1 thinking). No harm in that. The issue is when we fail to engage System 2 thinking which allows us to refine that thinking through thoughtful investigation and deliberation.
Trump voters seemingly fall victim to the affect heuristic (a System 1 behavior), where they allow emotion to drive. Then they fail to engage System 2 thinking to understand why Trump might not be a good choice, whether through his own failings or an understanding how Trump's policies/behaviors might negatively effect them.
Of course, Trump voters/MAGA people are not the first (or only) to fall victim to this. The "I'd like to have a beer with this guy" test is probably as old as politics itself. The problem therefore isn't using it, but rather willingness (or curiosity) to move beyond it. Seems like an interesting--and believable--argument to suggest that Trump's cult of personality has enriched this population compared to past politicians. An alternative, and perhaps less charitable, reading is that people have engaged deeper thought and have chosen to continue supporting Trump because though he might not help them, but he hurts those they don't like.
Thanks for sharing
I'm going to completely eject on the Trump part of all this, but focus on his points regarding what's going on socially in the country. I have to admit that I've found it very hard to get back into "socializing" post-COVID, and have little motivation or desire to do so. I certainly don't find myself in any type of conspiracy doom spiral, but just don't have a whole lot of interest in planning outings with other adults after a long day/week of work, and plenty of kid-related stuff as well.
I'm sure some of this is just the age/part of life I'm in, with kids in elementary/middle school stuff that takes up a lot of time and energy, and focusing extra hard on earning right now with college looming. But I feel as disconnected to the people around me as I've ever felt. And I don't mind it terribly, but it certainly seems like it could lead to very negative consequences.
Those people would never read that statement in the first
place.
Agreed, and I agree with Savage
regarding the people who can never be satisfied no matter what they say.
My first thought is I'm a big fan of Greg Sargent
and that the WaPo roster of columnists has been an abomination roughly from the time that he and Paul Waldman were launched by the clowns in charge.
Interestng New Republic article.
Not everyone
but these overgrown children have made such an embarrassing spectacle out of taking Dad's military out for a joyride that only the infirm and bomb-sheltered are unaware by now that America is at war with an oil-adjacent nation. And from there it's only a short mental journey to recognition of potential cause-and-effect. Too far for the man in charge, sure, but few are as doddering and deranged as that.
I'll ammend to "Plenty."
Certainly not everyone knows about this stuff.
--
Sometimes I rhyme slow sometimes I rhyme quick.
gonna need the receipts on 'most'
- No text -
Out of all the MAGA things I'm fucking sick of
what might actually rank #1 for me is Trump and his lemmings' insistence on sticking their fat goddamn nose into every nook & cranny of the news cycle and society at large to declare what is right or wrong, if not taking some ridiculous, overreaching action on the topic to impose their grotesque will. I just think back to the poor American Olympians in Italy who were grilled by the media about their thoughts on the current administration, and anyone who bothered to even attempt to answer the question was called a "loser" or "unpatriotic" if not outright doxxed by these rabbit-eared fucking ghouls. What sort of leadership does that to their own best & brightest?
And so it goes with Pope Leo, who is basically told to stick to sermonizing by that bearded fop Vance. Can't talk about "politics", in spite of the fact that Trump has effectively politicized every last goddamn topic over the past decade to the extent that he now declares moral authority over anything under the sun. Never a two-way street with these chucklefucks.
Most people don't know why gas prices went up.
They don't know about the war. The blockades. That Trump started it... None of it.
--
Sometimes I rhyme slow sometimes I rhyme quick.
Lt. Gov “Dan Patrick” (FKA Dannie Scott Goeb) on the case
Is an all time villain here in Texas. If he doesn’t have some Matt Schlapp/Byron Noem skeletons in that closet,
I’ll be gobsmacked.
I saw him outside Notre Dame stadium just before the A&M game and it took everything in my power not to heckle the old bag.
If the Church Lady were a cynical and wily Texas politician….
Ahh, the Heritage Foundation end game!
- No text -
Name the evil.
- No text -
Do they?
If was less online, I’d have zero idea that dowd was saying anything other than “ND loves the pope”. There isn’t even a reference to why he’s making the statement, or that anyone else DOESNT like the pope.
I agree -- it's an oversimplification of a human being.
- No text -
--
[Normal] Florida man
Then there's this
Trump commission condemns idea of church, state separation in hearing
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/trump-commission-condemns-idea-of-church-state-separa...
The Immigration Arch
If it gets far enough long, just name it for the immigrants that have made this country great. That should be a fitting reversal.
Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this arch.
- No text -
Except everyone knows what is animating it
So the answer is to talk about and make even more references to Trump? He’s a toxin that has infected so much of our discourse that we talk about him too much and now not enough? I think McElroy’s statement was better—woah a whole sermon is better than a tweet!—but I think Dowd did fine in doing what he did.
Right.
It seems to be an inflection point right now, especially after the weird AI image thing, where you make it crystal clear where you stand?
They could provide SOME context, though?
Just randomly saying “we like the pope” apropos of nothing is not really all that big of a deal.
I get that they aren’t going to take any stance against Trump under any circumstances. But they could at least say “when public figures attack or threaten the Pope, it is an unacceptable attack on the free exercise of religion.”
Instead they just said they support pope Leo in general, which I think everyone already knew. Dowd could have said this exact statement last week or last month, it’s completely unconnected to any particular situation.
Cue Chris Rock.
"I take care of my kids!"
And fwiw many progressives who have qualms with certain candidates or policies still go out and vote for them, bc we can juggle concepts like nuance and terrible, undemocratic alternatives. I'd like to think that the current, abhorrent state of things will cure most of the sitting-this-one-out-bro bullshit (for the next cycle or two, anyway). But I've been wrong before.
look at Cardinal McElroy
Then Dowd. Compare and contrast.
“ND supports the Pope.” Whoop dee do.
This reeks of making perfect the enemy of the good
I’d expect nothing less as a reaction, of course, from the partisans of the side of the aisle (who I find myself agreeing with more and more) who are dammed to continue taking Ls because they perpetually eat their own and fail to get out of their own way.
Or maybe it’s just the zeitgeist among many progressives that ND can do nothing right, ever … it’s a weird horseshoe theory instance of being matched with the Sycamore folks who think ND has sold its soul to wokeness and is irredeemable.
All of us are probably a mix of all three,
depending on the situation? The further something is from our personal experience, the more likely it is that we would be 3. I think that for politics, that's where most of us fall (but we justify it by thinking we are 1 and/or 2).
couldn’t mention Trump by name, though
- No text -
Fr. Dowd in support of Pope Leo
During the first Trump term, a Notre Dame CSC told a classmate of mine when he asked if Trump would be invited to be commencement speaker. The answer, paraphrasing, “If I have anything to say about it, and I do, he will never set foot on this campus.”
![[image]](https://cdn10.bigcommerce.com/s-dcvfa4/product_images/uploaded_images/maga-symphony-web2-copy-2.jpg?t=1769112207)