Agreed.
Although I wouldn't mind seeing us branch out from the PU/MSU rut to schedule teams like Iowa and Wisconsin, Minnesota is attractive because they could provide the sort of scheduling backfill that would be more palatable than, say, Temple. Additionally, they have the new stadium as an added perk, not to mention a rather fruitful pipeline in recent years (Floyd, Harris, Carlson, etc) that might be rewarded and further enhanced by an ND visit.
Complete thread:
- Texas has an opening for a home-and-home in '15 and '16. -
LaFortune Teller,
2010-07-28, 07:41
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- And Minnesota has an opening as well... -
MadisonDomer,
2010-07-28, 10:40
- We probably burned that bridge when we rejected their opener -
Savage,
2010-07-28, 14:08
- I'd like to see Swarbrick rebuild that bridge -
Sherman Oaks,
2010-07-28, 15:16
- I'd take Minnesota over f%#%ing Purdue.
![[ [ No text ] ]](themes/default/images/no_text.png "Empty posting / no text")
-
Pat (Moco),
2010-07-29, 07:15
- The Shark *(#* Purdue...he seemed to enjoy it -
MadisonDomer,
2010-07-29, 16:23
- The Shark *(#* Purdue...he seemed to enjoy it
- Agreed. - KGB, 2010-07-28, 15:39
- I'd take Minnesota over f%#%ing Purdue.
- I'd like to see Swarbrick rebuild that bridge -
Sherman Oaks,
2010-07-28, 15:16
- We probably burned that bridge when we rejected their opener -
Savage,
2010-07-28, 14:08
- That's odd. -
KGB,
2010-07-28, 08:00
- "Rainbows and Blowjobs" - FunkDoctorSpock, 2010-07-28, 08:30
- And Minnesota has an opening as well... -
MadisonDomer,
2010-07-28, 10:40