Smart move to put that in there.

by Kevin @, Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 10:53 (5798 days ago) @ Greg

That type of threat should do wonders for the settlement value of the suit.

DiNardo v. Vandy might offer some insight

by MattyCinNYC, Parts Unknown, Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 09:19 (5798 days ago) @ Sherman Oaks
edited by MattyCinNYC, Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 09:29

Though it was more about liquidated damages. There might be some stuff in the ruling though as they did discuss the permission seeking elements.

http://openjurist.org/174/f3d/751/vanderbilt-university-v-gerry-dinardo

That is a league-wide program for all players/coaches.

by MattyCinNYC, Parts Unknown, Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 09:18 (5798 days ago) @ San Pedro

- No text -

See para. 15

by Greg, seemingly ranch, Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 08:56 (5798 days ago) @ MattyCinNYC

"Culture of violation" reference. Yes, the Titans' attorneys framed it all in terms of the contract issue. But that phrase may raise some hackles, because it could lead to some interesting deposition subjects -- you know, to prove the "culture of violation" of which the Pola incident was part.

Except here, Kiffin induced a breach of contract

by Sherman Oaks, California, Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 08:14 (5798 days ago) @ Kevin

In that case, at least in CA, wrongful conduct is not an independent element of the tort -- as would be the case, for example, on a claim of interference with prospective economic advantage (where no breach is induced).

There still would be an affirmative defense that the conduct falls within the competition privilege, but USC and Kiffin would bear the burden of proof on this. And Kiffin's decision not to tell Fisher until after the fact could harm such a defense, at least in a jury's eyes.

Titans coaches get free car service 24/7/365

by San Pedro @, More than 100 feet from Bob Davies, Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 07:37 (5798 days ago) @ MattyCinNYC

Not too shabby and a pretty good safeguard against dui.

TN, like most, is another that requires malice, etc.

by Kevin @, Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 07:22 (5798 days ago) @ domer.mq

My quick take on these cases is they're always hard to prove, and particularly so when the interferer -- even if acting ruthlessly -- was focused on a business advantage for itself, and not hurting the other guy.

If the innocent side's injury is just the fallout from a self-interested move, these claims are tough to pursue.

Great move by the posteree there...

by domer.mq ⌂ @, Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 07:07 (5798 days ago) @ Chris

ducking so that the cameras wouldn't get his name and number for the poster.

--
Sometimes I rhyme slow sometimes I rhyme quick.

Wasn't it filed in TN?

by domer.mq ⌂ @, Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 06:30 (5798 days ago) @ Kevin

- No text -

--
Sometimes I rhyme slow sometimes I rhyme quick.

Tortious interference is a tough one.

by Kevin @, Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 05:47 (5798 days ago) @ Pat (Moco)

The bar varies from state-to-state, but I think I remember finding CA's was on the tougher end of the spectrum.

Specifically, if the interferer had a legitimate business justification for interfering -- other than, for example, to spite Jeff Fisher or screw the Titans -- you may not win. Because SC and the Titans aren't competitors, that can also make it tough.

Pola himself may be screwed, however.

Posterized is a legal term?

by Chris, Raleigh, NC, Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 05:47 (5798 days ago) @ Sherman Oaks

- No text -

In legal jargon that's what we call

by Sherman Oaks, California, Monday, July 26, 2010, 22:45 (5798 days ago) @ domer.mq

[image]

That's straight out of my BLaw class soph year.

by domer.mq ⌂ @, Monday, July 26, 2010, 21:13 (5798 days ago) @ Pat (Moco)

I doubt this will actually materialize to much, but it's still awesome.

And I'd imagine they have to act simply due to the complexities of protecting a staff from other pro organizations, let alone the Kiffin contingency.

--
Sometimes I rhyme slow sometimes I rhyme quick.

I don't know how they are going to beat this claim:

by Pat (Moco), Bar, Urban Chophouse Short North, Monday, July 26, 2010, 21:07 (5798 days ago) @ MattyCinNYC

11. Pola agreed in paragraph 11(c) of the Pola Contract that he would not "under any circumstances solicit discussions or entertain employment with any other person or entity during the Term unless...given written permission to do so by [Tennessee Football] or by the Commissioner in accordance with NFL Rules," and that "[v]erbal consent is inadequate." Pola Contract, para. 11(c)
12. Pola was not given express written consent by Tennessee Football or the Commissioner of the NFL to entertain employment with any other entity.

I'm only about to be a first year law student, but that seems pretty damn indefensible.

PDF of the lawsuit

by MattyCinNYC, Parts Unknown, Monday, July 26, 2010, 18:52 (5798 days ago) @ Pat

Has Pola's contract been signed?

by Greg, seemingly ranch, Monday, July 26, 2010, 15:34 (5798 days ago) @ Pat

I have no knowledge. And I wonder whether, if it is not signed by a week from tomorrow, it will not ever be signed. It seems to me that foregoing that signing would be a decent way for the university to settle the suit with the Titans, though it would still leave the head coach on the hook.

Which is to say, Heisman Trophy winner Mike Garrett better move fast if he wants to make sure his alma mater will have their RB coach this fall.

Kiffin said everything was ok now with Fisher

by MadisonDomer, Monday, July 26, 2010, 15:16 (5798 days ago) @ Pat

Did Lane lie?

Noooooooooooooo

I'm interested to see...

by MattyCinNYC, Parts Unknown, Monday, July 26, 2010, 15:15 (5798 days ago) @ Jim (fisherj08)

...if any more details come out about the whole Dillon Baxter fiasco.

Quite a start for Mr. Kiffin.

by Jim (fisherj08) @, A Samoan kid's laptop, Monday, July 26, 2010, 15:03 (5798 days ago) @ Pat

- No text -

way to get your employer sued, Kiffin

by Pat, in the cloud, Monday, July 26, 2010, 14:48 (5798 days ago)

Tennessee Titans sue Lane Kiffin, Southern Cal

The Titans on Monday filed a lawsuit against the University of Southern Cal and head coach Lane Kiffin for "maliciously" interfering with the contract of running backs coach Kennedy Pola.

The lawsuit was filed in Davidson County Chancery Court and it claims Pola breached his contract with the Titans after being induced by Kiffin. Pola, hired by the Titans in January, was hired by USC over the weekend as the school's new offensive coordinator.

http://www.tennessean.com/article/20100726/SPORTS01/100726032/Tennessee+Titans+sue+Lane...

powered by my little forum