Aldridge - yikes!
Aldridge - 7 of 22, 70 yards, 2 interceptions, 3 sacks for -30 yards, 1 scramble for 0 yards. Also of note-- 6 of these were hurries. Also, at least 5 fades were run, which are lower percentage. at the same time, there were plays where there was miscommunication between receiver and QB. Also, only one checkdown for Aldridge. Makes you realize that when we ran play action, defense really wasn't worried about 2 of the receivers (Aldridge, Schwapp). They weren't known for pass catching.
Hughes - 17 of 24, 291 yards, 2 interceptions, 1 sack for -7 yards, 1 scramble for 0 yards (monster bowl game performance: 6 of 7 for 162 yards). Caught 3 checkdowns.
Allen - 12 of 18, 261 yards. 6 of these were check downs to Allen, so you can see his value when the first target is covered. 2 more were screen passes. Therefore, 8 of the 12 completions went to Allen. 2 sacks for -11 yards, 1 scramble for 0 yards.
Complete thread:
- analysis requests -
Jay,
2009-02-14, 09:33
- Coverages into which -
terribletr,
2009-02-15, 18:28
- good one - Jay, 2009-02-15, 18:29
- Audible Analysis -
irishoutsider,
2009-02-15, 14:46
- Expanding on this - Pat (Moco), 2009-02-15, 20:12
- Redzone offense and defense. - PMan, 2009-02-14, 16:21
- Play action success/failure by down and featured tailback
- MadisonDomer, 2009-02-14, 14:20
- Is there any chance you do do a comparison of 08 and 05? -
PaulM,
2009-02-14, 16:37
- in the works - Spesh, 2009-02-14, 17:08
- looking at it by down & distance is pretty nutty -
Spesh,
2009-02-14, 14:52
- How many times did we run it on 3rd and long? 4th and long?
- Mike, 2009-02-14, 15:00
- here you go -
Spesh,
2009-02-14, 15:09
- Thanks - Mike, 2009-02-15, 08:41
- here you go -
Spesh,
2009-02-14, 15:09
- How many times did we run it on 3rd and long? 4th and long?
- Aldridge - yikes! -
Spesh,
2009-02-14, 14:38
- It's even worse for Aldridge... -
PaulM,
2009-02-14, 16:34
- actually -
Spesh,
2009-02-14, 16:47
- Absolutely brilliant stuff, thanks for the responses
- MadisonDomer, 2009-02-14, 17:39
- Absolutely brilliant stuff, thanks for the responses
- actually -
Spesh,
2009-02-14, 16:47
- It's even worse for Aldridge... -
PaulM,
2009-02-14, 16:34
- Is there any chance you do do a comparison of 08 and 05? -
PaulM,
2009-02-14, 16:37
- Coverages into which -
terribletr,
2009-02-15, 18:28