Ha I share the view of Mitch
I'll admit I'm seeing ACB through blue-and-gold-colored glasses.
--
Throw em out Marianne.
Complete thread:
- Mixed feelings on Judge Barrett's nomination -
JRT,
2020-09-26, 17:57
- I really don’t know anything about any of this. - APND02, 2020-09-27, 19:25
- Kind of related: why didn’t RBG retire under Obama? -
Jeff (BGS),
2020-09-27, 11:08
- Her argument was that he couldn't get a progressive - omahadomer, 2020-09-27, 15:00
- He asked her to in 2013 - BPH, 2020-09-27, 11:55
- Is a majority Catholic Supreme Court a sign of... -
PMan,
2020-09-27, 07:14
- Rum, Romanism and Rebellion! - Jack, 2020-09-27, 17:21
- It has been majority Catholic already -- - omahadomer, 2020-09-27, 15:02
- Senate questioning should focus on political issues - Regular Joseph, 2020-09-27, 06:04
- It's the result of Democratic political malpractice -- -
omahadomer,
2020-09-26, 19:51
- You forgot to mention the voter suppression -
KGB,
2020-09-27, 04:22
- Yes, she was handicapped -- -
omahadomer,
2020-09-27, 10:51
- I don't think relitigating 2016 is worthwhile. -
nedhead,
2020-09-27, 10:59
- Fair enough -- -
omahadomer,
2020-09-27, 11:04
- Trump took out the entire Republican field -
Jay,
2020-09-27, 11:23
- That was a function of the huge field -- - omahadomer, 2020-09-27, 14:58
- Trump took out the entire Republican field -
Jay,
2020-09-27, 11:23
- Fair enough -- -
omahadomer,
2020-09-27, 11:04
- I don't think relitigating 2016 is worthwhile. -
nedhead,
2020-09-27, 10:59
- They nominated the only person who could lose to this clown -
terribletr,
2020-09-27, 05:49
- You missed the part -
KGB,
2020-09-27, 16:08
- We have found an area of disagreement - terribletr, 2020-09-27, 19:36
- You missed the part -
KGB,
2020-09-27, 16:08
- Yes, she was handicapped -- -
omahadomer,
2020-09-27, 10:51
- If Roberts wants to save the court, -
nedhead,
2020-09-26, 20:12
- They'll laugh at him if he does. - omahadomer, 2020-09-27, 10:54
- IMO, long memory from Bork -
terribletr,
2020-09-26, 19:55
- It's the long shadow of Roe -- - omahadomer, 2020-09-27, 11:00
- Was he? - JRT, 2020-09-26, 20:16
- Didn’t they ask him “why don’t you support the CRA” -
Jim (fisherj08),
2020-09-26, 20:10
- Who exactly are you referring to with - terribletr, 2020-09-27, 05:35
- You forgot to mention the voter suppression -
KGB,
2020-09-27, 04:22
- The whole affair smells foul - hobbs, 2020-09-26, 18:10
- ordinarily, she’s fine -
Jay,
2020-09-26, 18:08
- I don't get that argument, with all due respect -
JRT,
2020-09-26, 20:19
- I do think she would have declined -
Jay,
2020-09-27, 11:28
- Where was she on record saying that? -
Ken Fowler,
2020-09-27, 11:34
- here -
Jay,
2020-09-27, 11:39
- That’s not what she said! -
Ken Fowler,
2020-09-27, 12:01
- nobody's arguing legitimacy -
Jay,
2020-09-27, 12:21
- I'm with Ken here - that's not what she said -
Coach Gillespie,
2020-09-27, 12:29
- It's also totally irrelevant and assumes the only legitimate - Dylan, 2020-09-27, 14:56
- maybe I'm not hearing it correctly -
Jay,
2020-09-27, 12:41
- I agree. - nedhead, 2020-09-27, 19:41
- Ha I share the view of Mitch - Coach Gillespie, 2020-09-27, 12:47
- I'm with Ken here - that's not what she said -
Coach Gillespie,
2020-09-27, 12:29
- nobody's arguing legitimacy -
Jay,
2020-09-27, 12:21
- That’s not what she said! -
Ken Fowler,
2020-09-27, 12:01
- here -
Jay,
2020-09-27, 11:39
- Where was she on record saying that? -
Ken Fowler,
2020-09-27, 11:34
- Given the divisions in the US, yes, -
nedhead,
2020-09-26, 20:25
- That’s unreasonable. -
Silk,
2020-09-26, 21:03
- I expect SC justices to be extraordinary - nedhead, 2020-09-27, 06:02
- That’s unreasonable. -
Silk,
2020-09-26, 21:03
- I do think she would have declined -
Jay,
2020-09-27, 11:28
- Ambition above justice -
nedhead,
2020-09-26, 18:24
- Someone was going to say yes. -
Silk,
2020-09-26, 18:38
- So is she. - nedhead, 2020-09-26, 19:07
- Someone was going to say yes. -
Silk,
2020-09-26, 18:38
- I don't get that argument, with all due respect -
JRT,
2020-09-26, 20:19