Indeed. I acknowledged it as such - punchy, genre-savvy, etc
- No text -
Complete thread:
- Swarbrick at the Echoes banquet -
Jay,
2016-12-09, 18:58
- Funny quip. -
Savage,
2016-12-09, 19:03
- I hope this is satire -
JD in Portland,
2016-12-09, 23:06
- Nice -
DEM,
2016-12-10, 09:05
- What? -
JD in Portland,
2016-12-10, 12:03
- How am I supposed to rad alt right lunatics ? -
DEM,
2016-12-10, 12:18
- a bunch of scorched earth internet bomb throwers -
JD in Portland,
2016-12-10, 12:21
- Oh I guess that's what alt right means -
DEM,
2016-12-10, 12:27
- At the risk of extending a pointless and silly exchange -
JD in Portland,
2016-12-10, 13:00
- If that was your point I agree with it -
DEM,
2016-12-10, 13:23
- Jim''s a lot of things. Disingenuous isn't on the list. -
San Pedro,
2016-12-11, 06:01
- exactly -
Jay,
2016-12-11, 08:53
- Well I disagree -
DEM,
2016-12-11, 09:13
- Having just ventured over there... -
PMan,
2016-12-11, 10:12
- Just opened up this morning's copy of the NYT - DEM, 2016-12-11, 15:13
- Having just ventured over there... -
PMan,
2016-12-11, 10:12
- Well I disagree -
DEM,
2016-12-11, 09:13
- exactly -
Jay,
2016-12-11, 08:53
- Jim''s a lot of things. Disingenuous isn't on the list. -
San Pedro,
2016-12-11, 06:01
- If that was your point I agree with it -
DEM,
2016-12-10, 13:23
- At the risk of extending a pointless and silly exchange -
JD in Portland,
2016-12-10, 13:00
- Oh I guess that's what alt right means -
DEM,
2016-12-10, 12:27
- a bunch of scorched earth internet bomb throwers -
JD in Portland,
2016-12-10, 12:21
- How am I supposed to rad alt right lunatics ? -
DEM,
2016-12-10, 12:18
- Aren't all of us University stakeholders? -
Jack,
2016-12-10, 10:28
- you managed to address -
DEM,
2016-12-10, 10:30
- And you managed to miss my point too, so we're even - Jack, 2016-12-10, 10:35
- you managed to address -
DEM,
2016-12-10, 10:30
- What? -
JD in Portland,
2016-12-10, 12:03
- Not satire, you can read my response to 99 below. -
Savage,
2016-12-09, 23:36
- I''m mystified as to where the idea comes from that - Jack, 2016-12-10, 10:12
- If you want to make the comparison -
CW (Rakes),
2016-12-10, 04:52
- I don't think any comparison is necessary -
Rob (Rakes of Mallow),
2016-12-10, 06:48
- Agree completely. It's going way beyond where it should - Jack, 2016-12-10, 10:32
- I don't think any comparison is necessary -
Rob (Rakes of Mallow),
2016-12-10, 06:48
- My political-Swarbrick thoughts: -
nedhead,
2016-12-10, 00:31
- This is really good. And it goes hand in hand with... - Greg, 2016-12-10, 14:02
- Oh yeah?!?! - Busco21, 2016-12-10, 12:07
- Outstanding post - Jack, 2016-12-10, 10:41
- This is a truly great post - JD in Portland, 2016-12-10, 10:39
- The Ubiquitous They -
Mike (bart),
2016-12-10, 05:08
- Public servants are well compensated? -
San Pedro,
2016-12-10, 05:17
- I think so - Mike (bart), 2016-12-10, 05:29
- Public servants are well compensated? -
San Pedro,
2016-12-10, 05:17
- Nice -
DEM,
2016-12-10, 09:05
- [Eye roll] You know, sometimes a joke is just a joke -
Jack,
2016-12-09, 21:06
- Indeed. I acknowledged it as such - punchy, genre-savvy, etc - Savage, 2016-12-09, 21:39
- good joke for the setting -
Jay,
2016-12-09, 21:10
- Pee Wee Herman made an identical quip -
Pete,
2016-12-10, 05:02
- yes! -
Jay,
2016-12-10, 07:24
- So annoying when celebs swipe anecdotes - Mike (bart), 2016-12-10, 07:31
- yes! -
Jay,
2016-12-10, 07:24
- Pee Wee Herman made an identical quip -
Pete,
2016-12-10, 05:02
- It's shocking really -
Bill,
2016-12-09, 20:03
- Buck Mulligan said it best - Jeff (BGS), 2016-12-09, 20:37
- What's he supposed to do? -
San Pedro,
2016-12-09, 19:49
- In fairness there are also earnest manners of response that -
Mike (bart),
2016-12-10, 05:18
- speaking of eye of the beholder -
Jay,
2016-12-10, 07:45
- I think, as a leader, Swarbrick is forced to decide whether -
Mike (bart),
2016-12-10, 08:33
- Would the result be any different? -
Bill,
2016-12-10, 09:03
- Probably not! -
Mike (bart),
2016-12-10, 09:17
- I know you're joking -
Jay,
2016-12-10, 09:22
- It isn't if you're prejudiced against Swarbrick - Mike (bart), 2016-12-10, 09:42
- I know you're joking -
Jay,
2016-12-10, 09:22
- Probably not! -
Mike (bart),
2016-12-10, 09:17
- Would the result be any different? -
Bill,
2016-12-10, 09:03
- I think, as a leader, Swarbrick is forced to decide whether -
Mike (bart),
2016-12-10, 08:33
- speaking of eye of the beholder -
Jay,
2016-12-10, 07:45
- One of the criticisms I find odd -
Jim (fisherj08),
2016-12-09, 20:52
- I don't recall him saying any such thing in the first place - Jack, 2016-12-10, 10:48
- Don't worry. This is likely a drive by post -
Domer99,
2016-12-09, 20:50
- This really was not intended to be a drive-by. -
Savage,
2016-12-09, 21:29
- Your quote: -
Eric M,
2016-12-10, 13:42
- Come on -
Rob (Rakes of Mallow),
2016-12-10, 14:02
- Sorry -
Eric M,
2016-12-10, 15:34
- So let me get this straight -
Rob (Rakes of Mallow),
2016-12-10, 15:53
- You do know that two different people made those comments? -
Pat (Moco),
2016-12-10, 18:31
- Good burn, bro -
Rob (Rakes of Mallow),
2016-12-10, 19:16
- are we going to work our way out of this death spiral? -
Jay,
2016-12-10, 19:41
- I was actually trying to post in good faith. -
Pat (Moco),
2016-12-10, 21:03
- Eric's analysis showed that it was one of -
Rob (Rakes of Mallow),
2016-12-10, 21:50
- Brian Kelly has been National Coach of the Year twice -
scriptcomesfirst,
2016-12-11, 03:26
- We will agree to disagree -
Rob (Rakes of Mallow),
2016-12-11, 05:33
- You're slowly walking it back -
Eric M,
2016-12-11, 06:29
- Something like that - Rob (Rakes of Mallow), 2016-12-11, 08:01
- You're slowly walking it back -
Eric M,
2016-12-11, 06:29
- There's also glossing over the Connelly numbers - NDTerp, 2016-12-11, 05:06
- We will agree to disagree -
Rob (Rakes of Mallow),
2016-12-11, 05:33
- Brian Kelly has been National Coach of the Year twice -
scriptcomesfirst,
2016-12-11, 03:26
- yeah, I agree with that - Jay, 2016-12-10, 21:16
- Eric's analysis showed that it was one of -
Rob (Rakes of Mallow),
2016-12-10, 21:50
- I was actually trying to post in good faith. -
Pat (Moco),
2016-12-10, 21:03
- are we going to work our way out of this death spiral? -
Jay,
2016-12-10, 19:41
- Good burn, bro -
Rob (Rakes of Mallow),
2016-12-10, 19:16
- You do know that two different people made those comments? -
Pat (Moco),
2016-12-10, 18:31
- So let me get this straight -
Rob (Rakes of Mallow),
2016-12-10, 15:53
- Sorry -
Eric M,
2016-12-10, 15:34
- Come on -
Rob (Rakes of Mallow),
2016-12-10, 14:02
- Nothing is "unsalvageable" - Jack, 2016-12-10, 10:06
- Jack has thin skin? - Bill, 2016-12-10, 07:31
- good post, well-stated - Jay, 2016-12-10, 07:27
- I love this board's passion, but you're confusing 3 things. -
MHB (Rakes of Mallow),
2016-12-10, 00:20
- Spot on. - River, 2016-12-10, 14:31
- It's the all or nothing approach that gets me. - Pat (Moco), 2016-12-10, 08:40
- cosign - Jay, 2016-12-10, 07:24
- Good, rational post -
Rob (Rakes of Mallow),
2016-12-10, 06:42
- I agree and disagree. - MHB (Rakes of Mallow), 2016-12-10, 08:42
- Well stated, MHB. - Joe I, 2016-12-10, 06:04
- Your quote: -
Eric M,
2016-12-10, 13:42
- This really was not intended to be a drive-by. -
Savage,
2016-12-09, 21:29
- Yup and nor should he. - River, 2016-12-09, 19:55
- In fairness there are also earnest manners of response that -
Mike (bart),
2016-12-10, 05:18
- I hope this is satire -
JD in Portland,
2016-12-09, 23:06
- Funny quip. -
Savage,
2016-12-09, 19:03