I echo what HR says
Try to engage without going off on someone personally. It's not hard to do.
Complete thread:
- What do y'all think of this? -
Grantland,
2016-12-05, 05:40
- So now Stanford is our "aspirational peer"? -
ReginaldVelJohnson,
2016-12-06, 11:37
- We're big on 'residentiality' again too. - Bill, 2016-12-06, 11:42
- There are several people who I respect.... -
MTIrish,
2016-12-05, 12:20
- Lord loves a workin' man -
Jay,
2016-12-05, 12:21
- In all seriousness... - MTIrish, 2016-12-05, 12:24
- Lord loves a workin' man -
Jay,
2016-12-05, 12:21
- I hope this makes them feel good about themselves. -
River,
2016-12-05, 10:44
- Spoiler: it will not -
Jim (fisherj08),
2016-12-05, 10:47
- OT: Just a quick question... -
Joe,
2016-12-05, 11:33
- Twenty, obviously. - Jim (fisherj08), 2016-12-05, 12:46
- Um, I drive around nude when ND plays well. - Grantland, 2016-12-05, 12:05
- Who hasn't? -
mkmcfrlnd,
2016-12-05, 12:05
- Who doesn't disrobe to the Catholic Channel? -
Greg,
2016-12-05, 12:11
- Methodists, that's who. - mkmcfrlnd, 2016-12-05, 17:09
- Who doesn't disrobe to the Catholic Channel? -
Greg,
2016-12-05, 12:11
- Some of these have been very clever - Chris, 2016-12-05, 12:00
- OT: Just a quick question... -
Joe,
2016-12-05, 11:33
- Spoiler: it will not -
Jim (fisherj08),
2016-12-05, 10:47
- I can't decide what was a bigger waste of money -
Pat (Moco),
2016-12-05, 10:14
- There are a lot of wastes of money -
Rob (Rakes of Mallow),
2016-12-05, 10:32
- That's a good point -
CW (Rakes),
2016-12-05, 10:38
- hey, whatever happened to the Rakes podcast? -
Jay,
2016-12-05, 11:29
- Just on a bit of a hiatus - CW (Rakes), 2016-12-05, 12:30
- hey, whatever happened to the Rakes podcast? -
Jay,
2016-12-05, 11:29
- I was trying to think of an appropriate response -
Pat (Moco),
2016-12-05, 10:36
- You need to start giving charitable reads to posts here -
HumanRobot,
2016-12-05, 11:16
- lol -
Pat (Moco),
2016-12-05, 11:24
- Why do you find that funny? -
Joe,
2016-12-05, 11:29
- Link -
Pat (Moco),
2016-12-05, 11:37
- Link -
Rob (Rakes of Mallow),
2016-12-05, 12:11
- not helping -
Jay,
2016-12-05, 12:19
- Now you sound like Brian Kelly -
MHB (Rakes of Mallow),
2016-12-05, 13:22
- the posting has been simply atrocious -
Jay,
2016-12-05, 13:23
- We're just trying to take the posting day to day - Samari, 2016-12-05, 13:26
- the posting has been simply atrocious -
Jay,
2016-12-05, 13:23
- Now you sound like Brian Kelly -
MHB (Rakes of Mallow),
2016-12-05, 13:22
- not helping -
Jay,
2016-12-05, 12:19
- Yeah, I guess I'm not following. - Joe, 2016-12-05, 11:54
- Link -
Rob (Rakes of Mallow),
2016-12-05, 12:11
- Link -
Pat (Moco),
2016-12-05, 11:37
- I echo what HR says -
Jay,
2016-12-05, 11:27
- I made my point below. -
Pat (Moco),
2016-12-05, 11:37
- just take a breath before you post - Jay, 2016-12-05, 11:46
- I made my point below. -
Pat (Moco),
2016-12-05, 11:37
- Why do you find that funny? -
Joe,
2016-12-05, 11:29
- lol -
Pat (Moco),
2016-12-05, 11:24
- lol - Rob (Rakes of Mallow), 2016-12-05, 10:40
- figure out a way to rephrase that -
Jay,
2016-12-05, 10:38
- I don't even know what point he's trying to make. -
Pat (Moco),
2016-12-05, 10:40
- perhaps ask about his logic -
Jay,
2016-12-05, 10:43
- I don't want to get into a back and forth -
Pat (Moco),
2016-12-05, 10:48
- I admitted the ad/billboard is a waste of money - Rob (Rakes of Mallow), 2016-12-05, 10:52
- well I was wondering too - Jay, 2016-12-05, 10:52
- I don't want to get into a back and forth -
Pat (Moco),
2016-12-05, 10:48
- It's pure utilitarianism -
MHB (Rakes of Mallow),
2016-12-05, 10:43
- The noblest of ventures. - Pat (Moco), 2016-12-05, 10:45
- perhaps ask about his logic -
Jay,
2016-12-05, 10:43
- I don't even know what point he's trying to make. -
Pat (Moco),
2016-12-05, 10:40
- You need to start giving charitable reads to posts here -
HumanRobot,
2016-12-05, 11:16
- That's a good point -
CW (Rakes),
2016-12-05, 10:38
- There are a lot of wastes of money -
Rob (Rakes of Mallow),
2016-12-05, 10:32
- Okay, this movement I can support - Bill, 2016-12-05, 10:07
- I'm sure the people involved feel good for participating. - Pete, 2016-12-05, 09:25
- The ads design is laughably bad -
HumanRobot,
2016-12-05, 08:45
- I think the medium is the message in this case -
Jay,
2016-12-05, 09:20
- Good point, but I have a simple solution for your worry -
KelleyCook,
2016-12-05, 10:12
- that's the image I had in mind - Jay, 2016-12-05, 10:47
- I agree. - Bill, 2016-12-05, 09:29
- At the same time -
HumanRobot,
2016-12-05, 09:28
- hey, if they want to build an oil pipeline across campus - Jay, 2016-12-05, 09:41
- Counterargument there: -
Pete,
2016-12-05, 09:33
- weren't they also physically in the way of the pipeline? -
Mike (bart),
2016-12-05, 09:35
- adidas might throw some money at this idea. - Buck Mulligan, 2016-12-05, 09:40
- weren't they also physically in the way of the pipeline? -
Mike (bart),
2016-12-05, 09:35
- Good point, but I have a simple solution for your worry -
KelleyCook,
2016-12-05, 10:12
- I think the medium is the message in this case -
Jay,
2016-12-05, 09:20
- It's Awesome - Eric M, 2016-12-05, 08:28
- Savage, can you repost what you posted? - Jay, 2016-12-05, 07:46
- Give your money to literally anything else instead. - Jim (fisherj08), 2016-12-05, 07:42
- I'll be the one to take the opposite viewpoint I guess... -
Mobster,
2016-12-05, 07:32
- Where do you see this polarization? -
Slainte Joe,
2016-12-05, 08:22
- I think it's important to define "polarization" - NDTex, 2016-12-05, 08:57
- I feel it -
CK08,
2016-12-05, 08:42
- I like this explanation - Tim, 2016-12-05, 12:21
- As someone that could be in said lunatic bin - NDTex, 2016-12-05, 08:19
- RE: the "divide" - HullieAndMikes, 2016-12-05, 08:15
- To what changes do you think ND is going to be amenable? -
Greg,
2016-12-05, 07:55
- think there's a lot to chew on in here -
Mike (bart),
2016-12-05, 08:13
- Yeah. -
Greg,
2016-12-05, 08:27
- Not only "what would happen to college football" - Jeremy (WeIsND), 2016-12-05, 09:13
- Which of those dominoes have gone "against" ND? -
HullieAndMikes,
2016-12-05, 09:11
- Off the top of my head -
Mike (bart),
2016-12-05, 09:24
- Thanks for the specificity -
HullieAndMikes,
2016-12-05, 09:41
- re tickets -
DEM,
2016-12-05, 09:47
- Question on this - Domer99, 2016-12-06, 10:50
- It's very possible -
HullieAndMikes,
2016-12-05, 09:50
- What do you all think our demographic is? - Grantland, 2016-12-05, 09:55
- re tickets -
DEM,
2016-12-05, 09:47
- Thanks for the specificity -
HullieAndMikes,
2016-12-05, 09:41
- Off the top of my head -
Mike (bart),
2016-12-05, 09:24
- I think this is right on - Mike (bart), 2016-12-05, 09:04
- Yeah. -
Greg,
2016-12-05, 08:27
- think there's a lot to chew on in here -
Mike (bart),
2016-12-05, 08:13
- I'm not sure about that "power" part -
Jack,
2016-12-05, 07:50
- I think that's right, and I think that's where the -
Mike (bart),
2016-12-05, 08:08
- That's not the way I take it at all -
Jack,
2016-12-05, 08:18
- By no means do I mean "conspiracy" -
Mike (bart),
2016-12-05, 08:52
- I think the Brandon thing has zero application -
Jack,
2016-12-05, 09:29
- actually i believe it was a new president that came in and -
Mike (bart),
2016-12-05, 09:34
- Let me backtrack on one thing. Brandon did not get fired - Jack, 2016-12-05, 09:40
- actually i believe it was a new president that came in and -
Mike (bart),
2016-12-05, 09:34
- I think the Brandon thing has zero application -
Jack,
2016-12-05, 09:29
- While I generally agree with your post - CK08, 2016-12-05, 08:33
- By no means do I mean "conspiracy" -
Mike (bart),
2016-12-05, 08:52
- Here's where I think the Admin is, re: football -
CK08,
2016-12-05, 08:16
- I have a more pessimistic view, but this is a great layout. - Savage, 2016-12-05, 12:57
- I think you are spot on in your assessment - KelleyCook, 2016-12-05, 10:26
- Probably accurate, but a lot disagree with them on #4 - Rob (Rakes of Mallow), 2016-12-05, 09:06
- The goals you've noted -
Bill,
2016-12-05, 09:03
- First, yes -
CK08,
2016-12-05, 09:10
- I think those football program goals are probably realistic -
Bill,
2016-12-05, 09:55
- That raises an interesting question -
Greg,
2016-12-05, 10:07
- I don't think Stanford's philosophy limits them - CK08, 2016-12-05, 10:57
- I would be happy as a clam with Stanford like results. -
Bill,
2016-12-05, 10:16
- me too - Mike (bart), 2016-12-05, 10:22
- That raises an interesting question -
Greg,
2016-12-05, 10:07
- I think those football program goals are probably realistic -
Bill,
2016-12-05, 09:55
- First, yes -
CK08,
2016-12-05, 09:10
- Nice job - Buffalo, 2016-12-05, 09:00
- this is pretty good - Mike (bart), 2016-12-05, 08:55
- That's a very good summary - Greg, 2016-12-05, 08:53
- Well said. - Jeremy (WeIsND), 2016-12-05, 08:48
- That's not the way I take it at all -
Jack,
2016-12-05, 08:18
- I thought you knew everything -
Jay,
2016-12-05, 07:51
- Well, you do know the only time I've ever been wrong - Jack, 2016-12-05, 07:52
- I think that's right, and I think that's where the -
Mike (bart),
2016-12-05, 08:08
- What questions do they want answered that Jack hasn't -
Bill,
2016-12-05, 07:42
- Agreed -
Brendan,
2016-12-05, 07:45
- I'm not sure why anyone was surprised, either - Jack, 2016-12-05, 08:03
- Agreed -
Brendan,
2016-12-05, 07:45
- In fairness to Jack Nolan - HullieAndMikes, 2016-12-05, 07:39
- Where do you see this polarization? -
Slainte Joe,
2016-12-05, 08:22
- was there a list of demands? -
Jay,
2016-12-05, 07:25
- This was just the airing of grievances. - Bill, 2016-12-05, 07:27
- All this does is look silly - CK08, 2016-12-05, 06:53
- That's really stupid. - domer.mq, 2016-12-05, 06:45
- Blaming Swarbrick for academic cheating is either naive -
HCE,
2016-12-05, 06:43
- Yep. College students cheating. Can you imagine - Jack, 2016-12-05, 08:22
- I think the ad is very silly. As a point of order, though -
Mike (bart),
2016-12-05, 06:56
- Sure, but holding him accountable for it is still absurd - HCE, 2016-12-05, 07:33
- One of the most embarrassing displays of frustration ever - scriptcomesfirst, 2016-12-05, 06:41
- I think that community should listen to its own advice -
South Shore Line,
2016-12-05, 06:37
- Bingo. - Bill, 2016-12-05, 07:19
- I think it's embarrassing because of one line -
Brendan,
2016-12-05, 06:08
- I think this misses the mark. -
Savage,
2016-12-05, 09:21
- Can you flesh something out? - Joe, 2016-12-05, 11:52
- A couple quick response because I have to run as well -
Jeremy (WeIsND),
2016-12-05, 09:35
- something that grinds my gears -
HumanRobot,
2016-12-05, 10:25
- That attitude started with Willingham - CK08, 2016-12-05, 11:03
- it is ubiquitous coachspeak (across all sports) - Jay, 2016-12-05, 10:54
- something that grinds my gears -
HumanRobot,
2016-12-05, 10:25
- The unremarkable line is in poor taste. -
San Pedro,
2016-12-05, 06:20
- It was in poor taste when Jack made the comment years ago -
Rob (Rakes of Mallow),
2016-12-05, 06:52
- I agree that it was a bad move by Swarbrick then - Brendan, 2016-12-05, 07:49
- It's amazing that many fans -
Domer99,
2016-12-05, 07:27
- I don't think it's a good phrase to use in the ad - HumanRobot, 2016-12-05, 15:35
- Agree, but the way they use in it the ad is wrong - CK08, 2016-12-05, 06:57
- It was in poor taste when Jack made the comment years ago -
Rob (Rakes of Mallow),
2016-12-05, 06:52
- I think this misses the mark. -
Savage,
2016-12-05, 09:21
- It's silly. - Bill, 2016-12-05, 06:02
- here's the ad -
Jay,
2016-12-05, 06:01
- Using that picture of Kelly makes it childish, to me. - mkmcfrlnd, 2016-12-05, 12:03
- Donate money to the Design School instead -
Jim (fisherj08),
2016-12-05, 07:42
- Yes. - PMan, 2016-12-05, 07:48
- For the sake of the people funding it... - Greg, 2016-12-05, 07:22
- Fruitless. But I understand the frustration. - San Pedro, 2016-12-05, 05:51
- So now Stanford is our "aspirational peer"? -
ReginaldVelJohnson,
2016-12-06, 11:37