But it's the same idea
If you miss early, you know you need 2 possessions.
Complete thread:
- As a rule coaches should NEVER chase the points -
hobbs,
2015-10-03, 20:44
- The problem going for 2 when down 12 -
Ken Fowler,
2015-10-03, 21:07
- Staples agreed with the call -
Jeremy (WeIsND),
2015-10-03, 21:26
- That's b/c he blindly follows the chart -
Ken Fowler,
2015-10-03, 21:31
- What's the f'ing point of having a chart... -
KA123,
2015-10-03, 23:58
- As I point out below, chart also said 2 when down 9. - Ken Fowler, 2015-10-04, 06:05
- Don't know if I believe him on run-pass option -
Jeremy (WeIsND),
2015-10-04, 05:47
- Maybe a pre snap option? - San Pedro, 2015-10-04, 06:23
- Seems true -
Jeremy (WeIsND),
2015-10-03, 21:35
- No. He went for 1 when down 15/9.Chart says 2. - Ken Fowler, 2015-10-03, 21:52
- What's the f'ing point of having a chart... -
KA123,
2015-10-03, 23:58
- That's b/c he blindly follows the chart -
Ken Fowler,
2015-10-03, 21:31
- Yep. Why doesn't our $5m coach get this? - NDNFO, 2015-10-03, 21:23
- Nicely done. - Slainte Joe, 2015-10-03, 21:11
- Good way to summarize it. - Tim, 2015-10-03, 21:10
- I agree with all of this - Brendan, 2015-10-03, 21:10
- Staples agreed with the call -
Jeremy (WeIsND),
2015-10-03, 21:26
- I don't understand going for 2, then kicking PAT -
Rob,
2015-10-03, 21:06
- PAT made it a one score game -
CK08,
2015-10-03, 21:31
- But it's the same idea - Rob, 2015-10-03, 21:36
- PAT made it a one score game -
CK08,
2015-10-03, 21:31
- So you were in favor of the call? -
Joe,
2015-10-03, 20:47
- Honestly I didn't have a problem with the decision - hobbs, 2015-10-03, 20:55
- You misspelled "final minutes". - Bill, 2015-10-03, 20:47
- That was in the 4th quarter -
PootND,
2015-10-03, 20:46
- Even so, it was stupid -
Brendan,
2015-10-03, 20:49
- Agreed. It was a poor call. - Bill, 2015-10-03, 20:57
- It was the wrong decision -
Dylan,
2015-10-03, 20:57
- Agreed. If you really want to puke, look at the box score. - Brendan, 2015-10-03, 20:58
- Exactly -
NDNFO,
2015-10-03, 20:54
- ND had failed 2-pt conversion and missed XP in MSU - LaFortune Teller, 2015-10-03, 20:55
- At that point did it seem we would go on a run? -
Spesh,
2015-10-03, 20:53
- I don't expect to find an argument that will convince you -
Brendan,
2015-10-03, 20:57
- Sometimes you have to gamble -
Spesh,
2015-10-03, 20:58
- If we're gambling there -
Jeremy (WeIsND),
2015-10-03, 21:01
- Because we got the ball back to start 3*rd -
Spesh,
2015-10-03, 21:04
- Based on the way Dabo played the rest of the game - Jeremy (WeIsND), 2015-10-03, 21:14
- Because we got the ball back to start 3*rd -
Spesh,
2015-10-03, 21:04
- If we're gambling there -
Jeremy (WeIsND),
2015-10-03, 21:01
- Sometimes you have to gamble -
Spesh,
2015-10-03, 20:58
- I don't expect to find an argument that will convince you -
Brendan,
2015-10-03, 20:57
- Absolutely agree -
Pat,
2015-10-03, 20:51
- I agree. -
Bryan (IrishCavan),
2015-10-03, 20:56
- We burned the TO because Robinson wasn't on the field -
Brendan,
2015-10-03, 21:02
- He literally dropped 8 points tonight. Tough game for him. -
NDNFO,
2015-10-03, 21:05
- Yep. Not a great night by AFROS. - Brendan, 2015-10-03, 21:09
- He literally dropped 8 points tonight. Tough game for him. -
NDNFO,
2015-10-03, 21:05
- We burned the TO because Robinson wasn't on the field -
Brendan,
2015-10-03, 21:02
- If there's a silver lining here -
Brendan,
2015-10-03, 20:55
- Do you think Clemson is a "very good opponent"? -
IrishGuard,
2015-10-03, 20:57
- I'm talking playoff scenarios - Brendan, 2015-10-03, 21:00
- I read all week that they aren't very good - HumanRobot, 2015-10-03, 20:58
- Do you think Clemson is a "very good opponent"? -
IrishGuard,
2015-10-03, 20:57
- I agree. -
Bryan (IrishCavan),
2015-10-03, 20:56
- I disagree -
PootND,
2015-10-03, 20:50
- That's intuitively appealing, but wrong. Saving it -
Buck Mulligan,
2015-10-03, 20:53
- It is standing on 16 in blackjack -
Spesh,
2015-10-03, 20:55
- We still had more cards to be dealt. - Buck Mulligan, 2015-10-03, 21:00
- It is standing on 16 in blackjack -
Spesh,
2015-10-03, 20:55
- That's intuitively appealing, but wrong. Saving it -
Buck Mulligan,
2015-10-03, 20:53
- Even so, it was stupid -
Brendan,
2015-10-03, 20:49
- Truly a puzzling decision - BPH, 2015-10-03, 20:46
- that was TW level game management -
HumanRobot,
2015-10-03, 20:45
- The 2-pt conversions were the least of the problems. - PMan, 2015-10-03, 20:48
- I disagree -
HullieAndMikes,
2015-10-03, 20:48
- I suppose it goes into a bucket with "get used to it" - Brendan, 2015-10-03, 21:04
- Same. - Jim (fisherj08), 2015-10-03, 20:55
- Totally agree - Jay, 2015-10-03, 20:54
- Agree. - bpeters07, 2015-10-03, 20:54
- I didn't like the decision... - MTIrish, 2015-10-03, 20:53
- No, it's legitimate criticism - BPH, 2015-10-03, 20:52
- I didn't like it when we lined up - Brendan, 2015-10-03, 20:50
- Bingo - Spesh, 2015-10-03, 20:50
- Yep. - Joe, 2015-10-03, 20:49
- it was realtime criticism for me -
HumanRobot,
2015-10-03, 20:48
- Yep - Pat, 2015-10-03, 20:59
- The problem going for 2 when down 12 -
Ken Fowler,
2015-10-03, 21:07