You're arguing a different point.
It's tough to gain traction for legislation based on a fishing expedition. I'm not arguing the underlying substantive issue.
Complete thread:
- Judge ruled for ND in the public records kerfuffle w/ESPN -
HullieAndMikes,
2015-04-20, 09:41
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- I have more than "discomfort" - HullieAndMikes, 2015-04-20, 10:00
- What's your professional opinion of this situation?
![[ [ No text ] ]](themes/default/images/no_text.png "Empty posting / no text")
-
Jim (fisherj08),
2015-04-20, 09:48
- To add, if this happened in a state other than Indiana -
HullieAndMikes,
2015-04-20, 09:45
- Maybe. This case isn't like the ones in Texas or Ohio -
Ken Fowler,
2015-04-20, 09:57
- It doesn't matter if it was fishing or not -
HullieAndMikes,
2015-04-20, 10:02
- That's an interesting proposition. - San Pedro, 2015-04-20, 10:26
- You're arguing a different point. -
Ken Fowler,
2015-04-20, 10:15
- Whoops. My bad, I misread -
HullieAndMikes,
2015-04-20, 10:34
- No worries. I'm about as big a fan as public disclosure - Ken Fowler, 2015-04-20, 11:16
- Whoops. My bad, I misread
- It doesn't matter if it was fishing or not -
HullieAndMikes,
2015-04-20, 10:02
- Maybe. This case isn't like the ones in Texas or Ohio -
Ken Fowler,
2015-04-20, 09:57