Purdue run play cut-up
This is our 2Q drive that starts about 5:00 before the half. We have just stopped Purdue on a 4th & 1 (after giving them great field position having to punt out of our own end zone).
We get the ball back on our own 28. First play is a handoff to Folston.
link should go to the play:
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x25xwxk_nd-pu-2q_sport&start=1460
presnap read:
- 3x1 personnel
- Folston left
- Koyack slot right
- Robinson split right
defense:
- six in the box
- looks like cover 1 man under
At the snap it will be a handoff Folston right.
* Hanratty at LG pulling right
* Elmer slanting inside
* Koyack releasing to the second level
Watch the two guys in red (DE and LB). They will be unblocked and wrap up Folston in the backfield for an easy TFL.
I cannot figure out the blocking assignments on this one. There are multiple problems here:
1. Obviously Hanratty is way too late to get over for any kind of lead block. The Purdue players are in the backfield and past him before he can engage.
2. Elmer ignores the DE over him to slant inside.
3. Koyack ignores the LB to engage the cover man over him.
4. Folston is dead in the water.
For this play to be successful, what should happen?
Complete thread:
- Purdue run play cut-up -
Jay,
2014-09-19, 07:37
- Thought on running against Purdue -
CK08,
2014-09-19, 10:41
- that seems pretty reasonable - HumanRobot, 2014-09-19, 10:46
- It's not cover 1 -
terribletr,
2014-09-19, 08:25
- thanks. was just a guess based on presnap read
- Jay, 2014-09-19, 08:32
- thanks. was just a guess based on presnap read
- Check to a pass with a 1-high safety - Mo, 2014-09-19, 08:23
- Also, what are the benefits of that formation? -
Mike (bart),
2014-09-19, 08:20
- Yeah, we ran outside to the near side a few times -
Brendan,
2014-09-19, 08:22
- cue the entire Holtz era - Jay, 2014-09-19, 08:32
- Yeah, we ran outside to the near side a few times -
Brendan,
2014-09-19, 08:22
- Couple of thoughts - Mike (bart), 2014-09-19, 08:08
- Elmer on lb - Supe, 2014-09-19, 08:06
- Looks like an inverted veer -
burger23,
2014-09-19, 08:02
- I agree with Burgs -
PBurns,
2014-09-19, 11:21
- I don't disagree -
HumanRobot,
2014-09-19, 11:36
- I would put this read squarely in the - PBurns, 2014-09-19, 12:14
- I completely agree on that -
burger23,
2014-09-19, 11:48
- putting apparent incompetence on tape - HumanRobot, 2014-09-19, 12:01
- I don't disagree -
HumanRobot,
2014-09-19, 11:36
- if it's inverted veer -
HumanRobot,
2014-09-19, 08:35
- That seems right - burger23, 2014-09-19, 11:07
- Inverted? - Greg, 2014-09-19, 08:25
- I agree with Burgs -
PBurns,
2014-09-19, 11:21
- First off, 6 players to block 7 defenders. -
PAK,
2014-09-19, 07:55
- Golson's read - burger23, 2014-09-19, 08:05
- I'm no OL coach, but my guess - ndroman21, 2014-09-19, 07:53
- Maybe if Koyack were attached and taking the DE? -
Brendan,
2014-09-19, 07:43
- Could Golson pull it there? -
Buffalo,
2014-09-19, 07:49
- If Stanley holds his block, I think so - Brendan, 2014-09-19, 08:20
- Could Golson pull it there? -
Buffalo,
2014-09-19, 07:49
- Thought on running against Purdue -
CK08,
2014-09-19, 10:41